Subject: Re: [xsl] XInclude in Cocoon From: Peter Flynn <peter@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 00:43:43 +0000 |
On Wed, 07 Feb 2001, Paul wrote: > Some XML parser has to parse all the entities-to-be-included, > and it sounds like your application should use a validating > parser to do that. That way, each bit would be validated > against its own DTD before inclusion. Yep. All the files are validated because they're created in a validating editor :-) But that doesn't stop some authors and [human] editors deciding to correct an error spotted at a late stage by "quickly" opening the file in a plaintext editor and "fixing" the problem -- invalidly. This is a management problem, not an XML or XSL problem, but the nature of the politics surrounding the application has convinced the implementors that a belt-and-braces approach is the safest course. Their apparently seamless join of a fragment-inclusion mechanism to a chunking server is quite impressive. ///Peter XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XInclude in Cocoon, Paul Grosso | Thread | Re: [xsl] XInclude in Cocoon, Paul Grosso |
Re: [xsl] XInclude in Cocoon, Paul Grosso | Date | Re: [xsl] CSS and XSLT, again, Mike Brown |
Month |