Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments From: Scott_Boag@xxxxxxxxx Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 23:22:04 -0500 |
Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > format-number() is another case in point of this. It > causes *real* pain when an implementor has to find away to implement such an > awkward mechanism when his language has perfectly useful, and far more mature, > numerical formatting constructs. Yes, I very much agree, format-number, in retrospect, was a mistake. > It *appears*, and I might be wrong, that this XSLT 1.1 draft > was produced without thinking of the general ramifications of the changes > outside of the Java interest. Please note that Microsoft is very much a part of the XSL WG. -scott XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Uche Ogbuji | Thread | RE: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Joshua Allen |
Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Scott_Boag | Date | RE: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Joshua Allen |
Month |