Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments From: James Clark <jjc@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 13:43:21 +0700 |
Alexey Gokhberg wrote: > For > vendors and users of non-Java XSLT processors XSLT 1.1 offers NOTHING in > addition to XSLT 1.0. What about the ECMAScript binding? The reason that only ECMAScript, Java and IDL have bindings in the spec is that they these are the only programming languages for which there are standard DOM bindings. Our language binding is based on the DOM (I'm not a big DOM fan, but W3C standards have to work together and that makes DOM the only realistic choice) and the DOM only has standard bindings for ECMAScript, Java and IDL. In the longer term, the W3C's XML Protocol Activity may provide the basis for a truly language independent way of implementing extension functions. James XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Uche Ogbuji | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Alexey Gokhberg |
Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Uche Ogbuji | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Steve Muench |
Month |