Subject: RE: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments From: DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 07:57:58 -0000 |
Steve Muench > Some people are talking in this thread as if the > introduction of <xsl:script> represents the > last element ever *needed* in XSLT, since anyway > you can just hack the rest of what you need in code. :-) > > That's not the point at all. > > Grouping primitives are being tackled for XSLT 2.0 > based on a set of use cases culled from the XSL FAQ > and ones submitted here on XSL-List (in addition > to ones that the working group came up with). > > These use cases will be published as part of the > XSLT 2.0 requirements document, when made publically > available soon on the W3C site. My preference would be for the group to bring that work forward and leave xsl:script until version 2. 25 Regards DaveP XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Uche Ogbuji | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Uche Ogbuji |
Re: [xsl] does xslt support max(), , Michael Hoffmann | Date | RE: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Tobias Reif |
Month |