Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments

[Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@xxxxxxxxx>]

--- James Clark <jjc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Adam Van Den Hoven wrote:
>  
> > If I write a document that I can say is 100% XSLT
> > compliant, then I demand that when I use that
> document in a processor that
> > is 100% compliant the resulting output is exactly
> as I have specified.
> 
> This is not the case in XSLT 1.0.  For example:
> 
> - Stylesheets that use extensions (whether extension
> functions or
> extension elements) are 100% XSLT compliant, but
> there is not guarantee
> that a processor will be able to handle them.
> 
> - XSLT 1.0 also allows extension of output methods
> and sorting
> datatypes, which are not guaranteed to be supported.
> 
> - XSLT 1.0 processors are not required to support
> disable-output-escaping.

O.K.
but if I use neither scripts nor extensions, I'm
pretty safe = my XSLTs are pretty portable.
What is left if I also don't use
disable-output-escaping?

Tobi

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list