Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments

Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments
From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:12:23 -0700
> : There is strong de-coupling between core SQL and any 
> : particular "language 
> : binding" (I assume you mean SQLC, SQLJ and the like).
> 
> Not to get off-topic, but how do you explain JDBC from Java's point of view?
> I don't think there are many people who have problems with escaping into SQL
> query from inside Java... or are there?

JDBC is not a SQL "binding".  It is purely an outside-in API.

The equivalent for XSLT would be a spec that allows you to invoke a processor 
from Java and handle the results (TRaX?).

This sort of thing is by no stretch a "binding".


-- 
Uche Ogbuji                               Principal Consultant
uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx               +1 303 583 9900 x 101
Fourthought, Inc.                         http://Fourthought.com 
4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA
Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread