Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call-template

Subject: Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call-template
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 23:23:47 GMT
>  Why does it need to be that complicated?

because if you introduce a system for binding XSLT written code to Xpath
functions that _only_ does simple cases eg, not cope with qnames as
function names or node sets as argumnements, then you may find your
options are severly limited when you come to specify the "full job"
if you have to keep compatible with a half way solution that has been
added earlier.


This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit

 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread