| 
 
Subject: Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1 From: Jeni Tennison <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 10:35:46 +0000  | 
Hi Guys, I just wondered if you could expand on: > 5. Easy distribution of extension functions, a reason commonly cited > for embedded scripting, can be addressed separately and does not > necessarily have to be solved with the script metaphor, convenient > as it may be. How would you like to see the easy distribution of extension functions being addressed? Thanks, Jeni --- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread | 
|---|
  | 
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> | 
|---|---|---|
| [xsl] Use of many <xsl:includes..> , Kevin Duffey | Thread | Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to wit, Francis Norton | 
| Re: [xsl] modular xslt design quest, Jeni Tennison | Date | [xsl] XML to WML/CHTML example need, Brian O'Neill | 
| Month |