Subject: RE: [xsl] xbind:module == xsl:script + an essential layer of indi rection From: "Kaganovich, Yevgeniy (Eugene)" <ykaganovich@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 20:27:29 -0800 |
What if xsl:script were changed from... : : > <xsl:script implements-prefix="date" : > language="lang:yyyy" : > : src="http://datestuff.com/xslt/extension/impl/dates.xyz"/> : : To... : : <xsl:script implements="http://datestuff.com/xslt/extensions" : language="lang:yyyy" : : src="http://datestuff.com/xslt/extensions/impl/dates.xyz"/> I find the XSLT namespace usage for bindings somewhat problemmatic. I think Clark made an argument earlier that these bindings could be used for other languages, not just XSLT, which I found convincing. Given that we can always include top-level elements in XSLT stylesheets if we really need it to be part of XSLT document, it seems better to have a separate namespace. - Eugene XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] question about test="tota, Jeni Tennison | Thread | Re: [xsl] xbind:module == xsl:scrip, Steve Muench |
[xsl] question about test="total[. , caihongshui | Date | Re: [xsl] xbind:module == xsl:scrip, Steve Muench |
Month |