Subject: Re: [xsl] Is XSLT the right name? From: Tony Graham - Sun Ireland - Staff Engineer <Tony.Graham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 11:21:02 +0000 (GMT) |
Martin Stricker wrote at 20 Mar 2001 +0100: > I'm ok with the name XSLT, I just would like to have a consistent way > doing the XSL names: Either XSL-T and XSL-FO (preferred) or XSLT and > XSLFO. Having XSLT and XSL-FO is weird. ;-)) Neither XSL-FO nor XSLFO are used in the XSL CR. "xsl-fo" appears only as the first five characters of "xsl-following", "xsl-footnote", and "xsl-footnote-separator". XSLFO doesn't appear at all. "XSL-FO" (and any variation on it that you've seen) is merely a term that has come into common use but that has no standing in the XSL CR. >From the point of view of the XSL CR, the formatting process is not a separable portion of XSL, so the CR never uses the term. Regards, Tony Graham ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Tony Graham mailto:tony.graham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sun Microsystems Ireland Ltd Phone: +353 1 8199708 Hamilton House, East Point Business Park, Dublin 3 x(70)19708 XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Is XSLT the right name?, Martin Stricker | Thread | XSLFO or XSL-FO (was Re: [xsl] Is X, Wendell Piez |
Re: [exsl] Naming exsl:return/exsl:, Trevor Nash | Date | Re: [xsl] xsl - variable - array pr, David Carlisle |
Month |