XSLFO or XSL-FO (was Re: [xsl] Is XSLT the right name?)

Subject: XSLFO or XSL-FO (was Re: [xsl] Is XSLT the right name?)
From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 12:21:52 +0000
XSLFO vs. XSL-FO --

Is there any guidance from the WG or any other "authority" on this?

Cheers,
Wendell

At 11:21 AM 3/20/01, Tony wrote:
Neither XSL-FO nor XSLFO are used in the XSL CR.  "xsl-fo" appears
only as the first five characters of "xsl-following", "xsl-footnote",
and "xsl-footnote-separator".  XSLFO doesn't appear at all.

"XSL-FO" (and any variation on it that you've seen) is merely a term
that has come into common use but that has no standing in the XSL CR.
>From the point of view of the XSL CR, the formatting process is not a
separable portion of XSL, so the CR never uses the term.

Regards,

Tony Graham

====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================


XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list



Current Thread