Subject: XSLFO or XSL-FO (was Re: [xsl] Is XSLT the right name?) From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 12:21:52 +0000 |
Cheers, Wendell
Neither XSL-FO nor XSLFO are used in the XSL CR. "xsl-fo" appears only as the first five characters of "xsl-following", "xsl-footnote", and "xsl-footnote-separator". XSLFO doesn't appear at all.
"XSL-FO" (and any variation on it that you've seen) is merely a term that has come into common use but that has no standing in the XSL CR. >From the point of view of the XSL CR, the formatting process is not a separable portion of XSL, so the CR never uses the term.
Regards,
Tony Graham
====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Is XSLT the right name?, Tony Graham - Sun Ir | Thread | RE: [xsl] Is XSLT the right name?, Evan Lenz |
Re: [xsl] Twig::, Xalan, and Charac, Francis Norton | Date | Re: [xsl] Twig::, Xalan, and Charac, Wendell Piez |
Month |