Subject: Re: [xsl] The "%" in DTD From: Peter Flynn <peter@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 21:12:48 +0100 |
On Sat, 16 Jun 2001, you wrote: > Tobias Reif wrote: > > maybe this could be of help too > > http://www.pinkjuice.com/entities/ > > This is also wrong in that it calls character references "entities", and, > as noted, fails to be a reliable reference when used with Netscape 4.x. It would be more useful if it omitted the stuff about browsers and concentrated on displaying (with little images) what the glyph *ought* to be, alongside the numeric value and the raw code/fontstuff for the browser to display or foul up as it wished. Using Microsoft Windows font names is usually regarded as rather poor practice. There should be eight columns: char#ref, icon, and then the raw code enshrouded in <font> for Times, Helvetica, Courier, serif, sans-serif, and monospace, so that those whose browser settings use other default fonts can see them as well as the three named fonts. ///Peter XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] The "%" in DTD, Mike Brown | Thread | Re: [xsl] The "%" in DTD, Michael Beddow |
Re: [xsl] The "%" in DTD, Mike Brown | Date | [xsl] Problem with selecting UNIQUE, Kevin Read |
Month |