Subject: RE: [xsl] Bug Sorting Zeros From: "Gareth Sylvester-Bradley" <gareth.sbradley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 14:51:07 +0100 |
> BEFORE THE SORT: 0,1,2,3,4....52,TOTAL > AFTER THE SORT (ascending order): 0,TOTAL,1,2,3,4....52 > AFTER THE SORT (descending order): 52,51,50......3,2,1,0,TOTAL Doesn't this look more like the string 'TOTAL' is being sorted as if it were zero (and a stable sorted used)? ************************************************************************* The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be privileged and confidential and intended for the exclusive use of the addressee. If you are not the addressee any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited ************************************************************************** XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Bug Sorting Zeros, Schwartz, Rechell R, | Thread | Re: [xsl] Bug Sorting Zeros, David_Marston |
Re: [xsl] operator && euivalent in , Oliver Becker | Date | [xsl] XSL => SMIL?, Roger |
Month |