Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: Microsoft XML From: sara.mitchell@xxxxxxxxx Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 14:47:48 -0400 |
Not to bash...but to pass on a rather passionate wish? [From: Joshua Allen Wednesday, August 15, 2001 10:42 AM] > (I'll agree that XLink is on-topic for this list, but I would > only point > out that it is a separate spec, and just because Microsoft hasn't > implemented it doesn't mean we are inventing our own version. > It's hard > to argue that a non-existent implementation is non-conforming.) > > Thanks, > Joshua Does this imply XLink support is at least being considered? The "inventing our own version" doesn't sound quite like support -- and I keep hoping that one (or better yet all!) of the browser vendors will do this, Sara XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Re: Microsoft XML, Robert Koberg | Thread | RE: [xsl] Re: Microsoft XML, Joshua Allen |
RE: [xsl] Re: Microsoft XML, Julian Reschke | Date | Re: [xsl] traversing the tree from , Chris d'Aquin |
Month |