RE: [xsl] Re: Microsoft XML

[sara.mitchell@xxxxxxxxx]

Not to bash...but to pass on a rather passionate wish?

[From: Joshua Allen Wednesday, August 15, 2001 10:42 AM]
> (I'll agree that XLink is on-topic for this list, but I would 
> only point
> out that it is a separate spec, and just because Microsoft hasn't
> implemented it doesn't mean we are inventing our own version. 
>  It's hard
> to argue that a non-existent implementation is non-conforming.)
> 
> Thanks,
> Joshua

Does this imply XLink support is at least being considered?
The "inventing our own version" doesn't sound quite like 
support -- and I keep hoping that one (or better yet all!)
of the browser vendors will do this, 

Sara

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list