Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: Microsoft XML From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 13:23:13 -0700 |
>protocols for the Internet at large. XLink has been a standard for a while >now, but, as you point out, Microsoft is working on "an improved version". That's completely untrue. Let me put it more simply: 1) Microsoft fully implements XML 1.0, XSLT 1.0 (and XPath). If you feel there are conformance bugs in these implementations, please let us know, because our goal is to be 100% conforming. 2) Microsoft hasn't implemented XLink/XPointer yet. Microsoft has no plans to change or reinvent either recommendation. 3) It is not interesting to talk about Microsoft's "long and sordid" past, social theory, or every spec that was ever invented. And it is off-topic for this list. There are plenty of other "advocacy" lists where people pontificate about those things. Items #1 and #2 above are facts, and are directly related to the comments in the O'Reilly book. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Re: Microsoft XML, Joshua Allen | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: Microsoft XML, Kurt Cagle |
Re: [xsl] Re: Microsoft XML, Robert Koberg | Date | RE: [xsl] pulling info from SVG fil, bryan . s . schnabel |
Month |