Re: [xsl] ancestor question

[Francis Norton <francis@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Wendell Piez wrote:
> 
> The trick is, that the value of a node-set is the string value of the
> *first* node in the node-set (in document order).
> 
I'm feeling picky picky picky today... just in case anyone reads the
above sentence out of its original context (now, how could that happen?)
may I point out that while it is true for xsl:value-of, it is not always
true - exceptions (ranging from the obvious to the less obvious) include
xsl:apply-templates, xsl:variable and document()

Francis.



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list