Subject: Re: [xsl] ancestor question From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2001 00:59:07 -0400 |
Wendell Piez wrote: > > The trick is, that the value of a node-set is the string value of the > *first* node in the node-set (in document order). > I'm feeling picky picky picky today... just in case anyone reads the above sentence out of its original context (now, how could that happen?)
may I point out that while it is true for xsl:value-of, it is not always true - exceptions (ranging from the obvious to the less obvious) include xsl:apply-templates, xsl:variable and document()
Cheers, Wendell
====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] ancestor question, Francis Norton | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSL Standards?, Francis Norton |
[xsl] Re: Is this possible in XSL?, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | [xsl] element with mark of exclamat, Helena Ginzburg |
Month |