Re: [xsl] reliability of MSXML

Subject: Re: [xsl] reliability of MSXML
From: Daniel Veillard <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 16:22:01 +0100
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 10:12:22AM -0000, Michael Kay wrote:
> >   Okay, I apologize to Mike for the harsh wording.
> No apology needed. I'm fully aware that I made some design decisions which,
> with hindsight, have proved wrong and have caused the community some
> portability problems.

  Question: what's the best way to try to get rid of the problem
	    (or at least make it easier to handle) ?

I didn't follow XSLT development lately, is the NodeSet/ResultValueTree
difference garanteed to disapear in 2.0 ? That would be a good indication.
Maybe the XSL WG chairs would agree on getting this information out,
possibly after consulting the group.

I assume SAXON has completely unified the two notions and so this would
requires a lot of code rewrite to (re)implement the distinction, even to
simply raise a warning ...

  Hum, the issue is not simple,


Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network
veillard@xxxxxxxxxx  | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit | Rpmfind RPM search engine

 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread