Re: [xsl] reliability of MSXML

Subject: Re: [xsl] reliability of MSXML
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 16:46:30 GMT
> A little strong, I think.  David already pointed out that the 1.1
> draft is worded such that to emit a warning would in fact be a
> non-conformance.

Although I do in fact agree with Daniel that having a widely distributed
processor that implements 1.1 rather than 1.0 by default is a real pain.

Given the choice, I'd rather have conformance to a rec and non
conformance to a withdrawn working draft than the other way round.

Having just spent a few hours trying to get a few thousand lines of
stylesheet (written by someone else) that was working on saxon to work
in MSXML by removing all the hidden 1.1 dependencies, I know how the
original poster feels.


This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread