Subject: Re: [xsl] document() and keys From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 01:25:33 GMT |
> but I think that's pretty horrible. Isn't there a better way? you can nest for-eaches, as in my reply, which is still fairly horrible, or better you can lean on Mike to extend Xpath for Xpath2 so you can use multi-document keys more naturally directly from xpath (but maybe you want to get the job done before that:-) David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] document() and keys, spam-from-xsl-list | Thread | [xsl] newbie: searching for web lin, Bryan Tarantina |
Re: [xsl] newbie: searching for web, David Carlisle | Date | [xsl] unconnected elements?, Michael |
Month |