Subject: Re: [xsl] order of UNIONs From: Jörg Heinicke <joerg.heinicke@xxxxxx> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 22:07:27 +0100 |
But does this really make sense? select="group[21]|group[1]" means for me 'select the 21st group and add the 1st group'. The existance of position() or [21] itself show that position and order aren't so unimportant in a node-set. And if I want to have the created node-set in document-order I can still use select="group[position() = 21 or position() = 1]". So I must build a RTF and use the nodeset()-extension-function. Joerg > > is it possible to influence the order of a node-set UNION like the following > > No as sets don't have an order (that's why they are called node sets not > node lists) > > David XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] order of UNIONs, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] order of UNIONs, David Carlisle |
[xsl] namespace issue?, Michael Case | Date | RE: [xsl] namespace issue?, Michael Kay |
Month |