Subject: Re: [xsl] order of UNIONs From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 21:36:32 GMT |
> But does this really make sense? Oh yes my postings always make perfect sense (even though the typing is usually pretty bad:) > select="group[21]|group[1]" means for me > 'select the 21st group and add the 1st group'. The existance of position() > or [21] itself show that position and order aren't so unimportant in a > node-set. No, they show position is important in the current node list, which is something rather different, and not a first class object that you can store in a variable. > And if I want to have the created node-set in document-order I can > still use select="group[position() = 21 or position() = 1]". So I must build > a RTF and use the nodeset()-extension-function. yes, or wait for xslt2 which will probably not need an extension for this (bcause the rtf restrictions were probably not the best idea ever:-) David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] order of UNIONs, Jörg Heinicke | Thread | RE: [xsl] order of UNIONs, Michael Kay |
[xsl] vertical positioning of page , Lisa Rupe | Date | [xsl] Re: msxml3.dll load crash, siyer |
Month |