Subject: Re: [xsl] xslt on server-side vs. client-side From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 14:31:37 GMT |
> In my experience, you have to be at least 5 years *BEHIND* the leading edge > if you expect to support more than 50% of the public. so, given XSLT's only been out 2 years we should be ready to go in about 3 more. That's OK. If we start planning now, should just about be ready in time. However are you really saying that most windows users are still on Windows 95 (and NT<whatever was current in 1996>)? David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] xslt on server-side vs. c, Chris Bayes | Thread | RE: [xsl] xslt on server-side vs. c, Chris Bayes |
RE: [xsl] the last substring, yan bai | Date | RE: [xsl] xslt on server-side vs. c, Chris Bayes |
Month |