| 
 
Subject: Re: [xsl] xslt on server-side vs. client-side From: "cutlass" <cutlass@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 14:21:42 -0000  | 
huh ?????? lifecycles are becoming fragmented, though this is a favorable marketing condition, not a good condition for creating stable software; versioning doesnt mean anything ( build number is more important ) any more as the lag between release and recieving feedback ( and subsequent patch ) on that release grows smaller and smaller. 5 years, those days are long gone...... or never were ? computing has only been around usefully for about 50-60 years or so; which means 5 years is approx 10% of the the entire lifetime of computing..... 18 mths is my timeline to stability with a heavy dose of risk analysis. cheers, jim fuller ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Kenton" <jkenton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > .. > .. IE6 hasn't been out long and netscape 6.1 even less (and to be honest > .. xslt in NS 6.x isn't really stable enough to be used yet, although it's > .. getting better all the time) > .. > > In my experience, you have to be at least 5 years *BEHIND* the leading edge > if you expect to support more than 50% of the public. > > --jeff > > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread | 
|---|
  | 
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> | 
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] xslt on server-side vs. c, Jeff Kenton | Thread | RE: [xsl] xslt on server-side vs. c, Chris Bayes | 
| RE: [xsl] Jeni reminds me....., McKeever, Marty | Date | RE: [xsl] Looping over a CSV in XSL, Jeff Beadle | 
| Month |