RE: [xsl] XSL stylesheet for XHTML

Subject: RE: [xsl] XSL stylesheet for XHTML
From: sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 23:34:56 +0000

Chris Bayes writes:

 >  If you can go one way then why not the other?

because FO is lossy, basically.

sebastian


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] XSL stylesheet for XHTML, (continued) David Carlisle - Thu, 22 Nov 2001 23:07:41 GMT sebastian . rahtz - Thu, 22 Nov 2001 23:33:49 +0000 David Carlisle - Fri, 23 Nov 2001 09:25:19 GMT Chris Bayes - Thu, 22 Nov 2001 23:09:15 -0000 sebastian . rahtz - Thu, 22 Nov 2001 23:34:56 +0000 <= David Carlisle - Thu, 22 Nov 2001 22:55:26 GMT Chris Bayes - Thu, 22 Nov 2001 23:57:55 -0000 Nikolai Grigoriev - Fri, 23 Nov 2001 14:21:33 +0300 Nathalie Pult - Fri, 23 Nov 2001 11:43:13 +0100 (MET)

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] XSL stylesheet for XHTML, (continued)
- Nathalie Pult - Fri, 23 Nov 2001 11:43:13 +0100 (MET)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: [xsl] XSL stylesheet for XHTML, Chris Bayes	Thread	Re: [xsl] XSL stylesheet for XHTML, David Carlisle
Re: [xsl] XSL stylesheet for XHTML, sebastian . rahtz	Date	RE: [xsl] XSL stylesheet for XHTML, Chris Bayes
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home