Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: XPath incompatibilities From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 10:03:53 -0500 |
Another option that's on the table is that we never interpret "<" as a lexicographic comparison, forcing the user to use the compare() function instead, or perhaps the new "lt" operator.).
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Writer/Programmer | +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001) | | http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/books/bible2/ | | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ | Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ | | Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Re: XPath incompatibiliti, Jeni Tennison | Thread | RE: [xsl] Re: XPath incompatibiliti, Michael Kay |
[xsl] Lare XML files, Gilles Maurice | Date | For expressions and / operator in X, Jeni Tennison |
Month |