Re: [xsl] XPath 2.0

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

Re: [xsl] XPath 2.0

Subject: Re: [xsl] XPath 2.0
From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 16:44:34 +0000

David C. wrote:
>> I might be reading it wrong, but I think that the << operator is
>> supposed to cover the combination of ancestor and preceding axes.
>> So if you did:
>
> more than that I think: document order orders nodes across documents
> (in an implementation way) whereas nodes in different documents are
> not comparable with orderings based on an axes.

Coo.

Jeni

---
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com/


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] XPath 2.0, (continued) David Carlisle - Tue, 8 Jan 2002 21:45:43 GMT Evan Lenz - Tue, 8 Jan 2002 14:16:57 -0800 naha - Wed, 09 Jan 2002 13:18:46 -0500 (EST) David Carlisle - Tue, 8 Jan 2002 16:23:54 GMT Jeni Tennison - Tue, 8 Jan 2002 16:44:34 +0000 <= Paul Terray - Tue, 08 Jan 2002 17:38:01 +0100 David Carlisle - Tue, 8 Jan 2002 16:49:13 GMT Joerg Heinicke - Tue, 8 Jan 2002 20:10:10 +0100 Ed Blachman - Tue, 8 Jan 2002 16:35:34 -0500

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] XPath 2.0, (continued)
- Ed Blachman - Tue, 8 Jan 2002 16:35:34 -0500

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] XPath 2.0, David Carlisle	Thread	[xsl] How to know if an attribute i, Paul Terray
[xsl] How to know if an attribute i, Paul Terray	Date	Re: [xsl] How to know if an attribu, David Carlisle
	Month