|
Subject: RE: [xsl] basic question about xpath support of xml schema From: "Bryan Rasmussen" <bry@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 14:17:24 +0100 |
>If W3C support one to the detriment of others, there could trouble. >I think there's a word for it in America? <joke><word def="w1">Microsoftism</word> isn't officially in the dictionary yet.</joke> <definitions defid="w1">doing something specifically for the benefit of microsoft while making one's actions seem to be for the common good <example>The Bush Administration continues in their campaign of Microsoftism.</example></definitions> I'm sorry, I just couldn't resist. I'm evil. okay. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] basic question about xpat, DPawson | Thread | RE: [xsl] basic question about xpat, DPawson |
| [xsl] exclude-result-prefixes and x, Joerg Pietschmann | Date | RE: [xsl] SGML to HTML conversion., Didier PH Martin |
| Month |