Subject: RE: [xsl] basic question about xpath support of xml schema From: "Bryan Rasmussen" <bry@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 14:27:44 +0100 |
>W3C is heavily committed to schemas and these specifications are being >developed within W3C. We may not like it, but it's a fact of life. W3C is heavily committed to xslt and xpath too, isn't it? It seems to me that some of the schema strategy is a classic mistake of putting one's principal at risk in hopes of bigger gains(principal being used in the monetary sense with a metaphorical intent in this case). XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] basic question about xpat, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: [xsl] basic question about xpat, DPawson |
RE: [xsl] SGML to HTML conversion., Didier PH Martin | Date | Re: [xsl] Enumerating template matc, Morten |
Month |