|
Subject: RE: [xsl] Grouping conditions From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 11:00:51 -0000 |
> With XSLT 2.0 you can write
> <xsl:when test="@type = ('101', '102', '103')">
>
> I don't think that I have an xslt/xpath 2.0 parser. I use
> msxml 3.0 - does
> version 4.0 contain version 2.0.
No, I expect it will be some time before Microsoft issue an XSLT 2.0
implementation, except perhaps as a technology preview. They were badly
bitten with WD-xsl by releasing a product before XSLT 1.0 stabilised, and I
doubt they will make the same mistake again. But you can experiment with the
XSLT 2.0 working draft using Saxon 7.0.
>
> Will the version be backwards compatible. I have read some of the
> discussions regarding 2.0 and there seem to be some
> functionality that will be totally changed..?
I think we've achieved quite a good level of backwards compatibility in the
current working drafts, given the extent of the changes to the type system,
but there are a few glitches that need to be ironed out: hopefully future
working drafts will make it better rather than worse.
>
> On the other hand, off course I would like to use the newer,
> more complete,
> programming language. How do I do this when I am restricted
> to Microsoft
> products that is used where I work?
>
If you are restricted to using Microsoft products, all I can do is offer my
heartfelt sympathy, and my encouragement to get the policy changed.
Michael Kay
Software AG
home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx
work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Grouping conditions, Jeni Tennison | Thread | Re: [xsl] Grouping conditions, Ragulf Pickaxe |
| Re: [xsl] [solved] key with many us, Jeni Tennison | Date | Re: [xsl] Stylesheet for XSD anywhe, Christopher R. Maden |
| Month |