Subject: Re: [xsl] attribute order From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 13:48:07 GMT |
> But did they get round to saying that the order of elements *WAS* > significant? No, but surely everything is significant unless otherwise stated. Otherwise a parser would be able to return <x/> for every well formed document, discarding all the information about the original element names and order. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] attribute order, Daniel Veillard | Thread | RE: [xsl] attribute order, Andrew Welch |
Re: [xsl] attribute order, Daniel Veillard | Date | Re: [xsl] Off-topic: XSD Mailing Li, David Carlisle |
Month |