Subject: Re: content management stuff - was -> Re: [xsl] a simple case study From: Jarkko.Moilanen@xxxxxx Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 06:40:18 +0300 (EEST) |
> >It's a problem if you care about alienating people who might be > valuable > >contributors to the discussion. So it comes to the eternal (rhetorical) question. Can I please everyone? But hey, my question (and some others on this list) was that is it propriate to include management stuff to this list? So now I know that it is not. This is the only thing I was looking for, a answer from the lsit-owner. Thanks for it, let's keep going. >One of the people I know who refuses to >subscribe is Uche Ogbuji, whose name may be known to many of you. FWIW. This is unfortunate for us. Sorry to be a poor peasant and not knowing what is ment by FWIW. But that is out of the topic. Cheers Jarkko ******************************************************************* Jarkko Moilanen *You are wise, witty, and wonderful, * Researcher/ ITCM *but you spend too much time * jarkko.moilanen@xxxxxx *reading this sort of trash. * www.uta.fi/~jm60697 * * GSM: +358 50 3766 927 * * ******************************************************************* * ITCM Information Technology and Crisis Management * ******************************************************************* XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: content management stuff - was , Robert Koberg | Thread | [xsl] Passing custom tags to jsp vi, Denis McCarthy |
RE: [xsl] standard method of docume, Chris Bayes | Date | [xsl] new user xslt, CHAOUI Hassan |
Month |