|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Output XML doc with XSL doc name in comment From: Mike Ferrando <mikeferrando@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 10:58:35 -0700 (PDT) |
--- David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > p.s. What is strange is that SAXON obviously knows the file names
> it
> > is processing,
>
> It isn't obvious that the XML it is processing has a name. Both the
> source XML and the stylesheet might come from standard input
> stream, or
> from a stream of sax events or....
Dear David C.,
Even given what you have said, isn't it true that I must call up a
file name whether it be from the command line, or with xsl:import or
xsl:include, etc.? And if so, then why not capture those ?.xsl names
for the comment either at their location or globally? Again, SAXON
has the name/path anyway.
> Every Xpath node does however have a base URI associated, but XSLT
> gives
> no standard access to that information. saxon has a saxon:systemId
> extension to get at it though....
???
<saxon:systemID select="document('')"/>
Sincerely,
Mike Ferrando
Washington, DC
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness
http://health.yahoo.com
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Output XML doc with XSL d, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Output XML doc with XSL d, David Carlisle |
| RE: [xsl] Output of a Jscript varia, Stuart Celarier | Date | [xsl] Javascript looping expression, Zoe Peng |
| Month |