Re: [xsl] XSLT/XPath 2.0 (was "Identifying two tags...")

Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT/XPath 2.0 (was "Identifying two tags...")
From: Evan Lenz <evan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 13:09:52 -0700
On Monday, May 13, 2002, at 12:11 PM, Jeni Tennison wrote:

Hi Sara,
good to raise those concerns now, while the WGs are still considering
which parts of, for example, XPath 2.0 are really necessary. I
encourage you, and indeed everyone, to write to
public-qt-comments@xxxxxx describing what parts you find particularly
hard to understand and which parts you think are unnecessary.

I'd also add to Jeni's note that if you (or anyone else) are in favor of a conformance level for XSLT 2.0 that does not require XML Schema validation,
we would like to hear about it, including any specific requirements for what such a conformance level would entail. You may have a better chance of success if you put your hopes in a conformance level, rather than trying to fight the inclusion of XML Schemas altogether.

Evan Lenz
(speaking for himself only, not for the XSL WG)

XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread