Subject: RE: [xsl] fo:inline vs. fo:wrapper From: DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 10:16:27 +0100 |
> Is there something about fo:inline that prevents them from > breaking across > lines? Errr, yes. If they broke across lines they wouldn't be inlines? The lines are generated by the formatter from your content. if you specify long inlines, then you need to account for overflows. > > I'm prepared to use fo:wrapper to instigate momentary > changes, say, into an > italic face -- but had supposed fo:inline was the right way. <fo:block style='for majority'> .... <fo:inline style='for this bit'> ... </inline> </block> should do that Wendell. What am I missing? regards DaveP - NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your system. RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] tags?, James Fuller | Thread | Re: [xsl] fo:inline vs. fo:wrapper, David Tolpin |
[xsl] tags?, x calibre | Date | RE: [xsl] tags?, Jarno . Elovirta |
Month |