|
Subject: Re: [xsl] fo:inline vs. fo:wrapper From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 13:13:57 +0100 |
> But if the content of an inline is only pcdata, does the formatter still
> break it David?
> I thought not?
[I know I'm not the David you mean but...] I'd certainly _expect_ them
to be broken. fo:inline is "inline" in the sense that an HTML <em> or a
latex \textbf{...} is inline, it's used to change some properties of
the text but the result is still part of the main text flow and takes
part in line breaking etc.
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] fo:inline vs. fo:wrapper, DPawson | Thread | Re: [xsl] fo:inline vs. fo:wrapper, Wendell Piez |
| Re: [xsl] more encoding woe, David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] Keep-together and friends, STEPHEN_R_FRIEDLAND |
| Month |