Subject: Re: [xsl] fo:inline vs. fo:wrapper From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 13:13:57 +0100 |
> But if the content of an inline is only pcdata, does the formatter still > break it David? > I thought not? [I know I'm not the David you mean but...] I'd certainly _expect_ them to be broken. fo:inline is "inline" in the sense that an HTML <em> or a latex \textbf{...} is inline, it's used to change some properties of the text but the result is still part of the main text flow and takes part in line breaking etc. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] fo:inline vs. fo:wrapper, DPawson | Thread | Re: [xsl] fo:inline vs. fo:wrapper, Wendell Piez |
Re: [xsl] more encoding woe, David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] Keep-together and friends, STEPHEN_R_FRIEDLAND |
Month |