|
Subject: Re: [xsl] processing-instruction() From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 16:05:08 +0100 |
> Actually, I think the processing-instruction('Eqn') matching template
> has a priority of 0 while the node() matching template has a priority
> of -0.5:
Actually, so did I, and rather than do my usual trick of quoting the
spec (incorrectly) from memory I fired it up and read the default
priority rules before posting my answer...
Of course I forgot to take into account that I'm getting too old to
read the spec and skipped over the *or has the form...
bit:-) Oh well...
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] processing-instruction(), Jeni Tennison | Thread | RE: [xsl] processing-instruction(), Jiang, Peiyun |
| [xsl] Re: processing-instruction(), Dimitre Novatchev | Date | Re: [xsl] java extension in xsl hel, Zoe Peng |
| Month |