Subject: Re: [xsl] generalized unique element From: "Laura Jenkins" <xsl_list@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 13:13:28 +0000 |
sorry to post this again.. its a bit not clear for me how to sort this out..
tried doing something like.. <xsl:if test="not(name(.) = preceding::node()/name())">
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] generalized unique element Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 13:08:34 +0100
> I thot of Muenchen way , but i stood back becase it requires to know the > name of the element that has to be unique..
no it doesn't. You just need a key that matches "*" and uses a key value of "name(.)"
David
_____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
_________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] generalized unique elemen, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] generalized unique elemen, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] Joining Multiple XML usin, Joseph Kesselman | Date | RE: [xsl] doe alternative?, Michael Kay |
Month |