Subject: Re: [xsl] generalized unique element From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:58:51 +0100 |
Mike> It all gets easier in XPath 2.0, where you can write Mike> Mike> <xsl:if test="every $x in preceding-sibling::* Mike> satisfies name($x) != name(.)"> Are you _sure_ that's easier than <xsl:if test="preceding-sibling::*[name(.)=name(current())]"> (it gets more useful in nested contexts where current() doesn't do the right thing) David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] generalized unique elemen, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] generalized unique elemen, Michael Kay |
Re: Re: [xsl] generalized unique el, scruss | Date | Re: [xsl] Getting desired node on t, David Carlisle |
Month |