Subject: Re: [xsl] MSXML / NBSP problem and resolution From: Mike Brown <mike@xxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 15:14:03 -0700 (MST) |
Michael H. Semcheski wrote: > Changing the encoding in the output method node does not seem to affect > the meta tag inserted by MSXML right after the head, as long as the > output method="html". In that case, I'm guessing there's still someting specific to the way you're going about it that is causing this to happen, because I am 95% sure most folks using MSXML don't have this issue. Hopefully one of the MSXML techs will notice this thread and contribute a more helpful reply. > As I said earlier, it can be overridden by adding a response.charset at > the top of the ASP page. The meta tag still appears, but presumably IE > ignores the meta tag if the charset is explicitly defined in the http > header. Yes, that's standard/required behavior (preferring the actual header over the equivalent meta tag). Same goes for XML. > The question then, is MSXML 3.0 broken because it adds the meta node > into the result set if output method="html"? No, it is encouraged to do that by the XSLT spec. - Mike ____________________________________________________________________________ mike j. brown | xml/xslt: http://skew.org/xml/ denver/boulder, colorado, usa | resume: http://skew.org/~mike/resume/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] MSXML / NBSP problem and , David Carlisle | Thread | RE: [xsl] MSXML / NBSP problem and , Thomas V. Nielsen |
Re: [xsl] Tracking line counts uniq, J.Pietschmann | Date | Re: [xsl] MSXML / NBSP problem and , Mike Brown |
Month |