Re: [xsl] MSXML / NBSP problem and resolution

Subject: Re: [xsl] MSXML / NBSP problem and resolution
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 10:39:47 GMT
> Everything that comes under serialization is a "should" because
> serialization itself is optional.

yes i understand why html output method is optional, I'm just not sure
that it couldn't be more specified in teh cases that teh ssystem choses
to support it.

> My own view (and the way that XSLT 2.0 may go) is that serialization
> should be an optional conformance module, and that most of the things
> within it should then be "must"s.

sounds good to me.


> XSLT 2.0 already has an option to switch off the generation of the
> <META> element, on the grounds that users may prefer to do it
> themselves.

users may say they prefer it, but will they get it right:-)

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread