Subject: [xsl] Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0: What is the most efficient way to find if a sequence is empty? From: "Dimitre Novatchev" <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 20:25:00 +0200 |
> There are two complementary functions empty($seq) and exists($seq). > > I would expect any decent optimizer to generate exactly the same code > for these as for count($x)=0 - but I guess there are processors out > there that don't have decent optimizers. Thank you, Mike. The name "exists" does not describe very well what the function actually does. A far-better name is "non-empty", and it is immediately perceived as the really complementary function to empty(). ===== Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev. http://fxsl.sourceforge.net/ -- the home of FXSL XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XPath/XSLT 2.0: What is t, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0: What , Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] XPath/XSLT 2.0: What is t, Michael Kay | Date | [xsl] XPath 2.0: Problems with the , Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |