Subject: RE: [xsl] variable visibility From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 17:38:33 +0100 |
> > Well, I did not consider such (d,e,f and g) as siblings in > that sense as > they did not use the xsl namespace. > Thanks anyway > Ragulf Pickaxe :) Siblings are nodes that are children of the same parent. Their names don't come into the matter. Michael Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] variable visibility, Ragulf Pickaxe | Thread | [xsl] XSL-FO Property Resolution / , Stefan Hermann |
Re: [xsl] Generating an Xpath expre, Jeff Kenton | Date | RE: [xsl] Immediately preceding-sib, Michael Kay |
Month |