Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: Re: html table of sorted element names From: Saverio Perugini <sperugin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 10:08:52 -0500 (EST) |
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Dimitre Novatchev wrote: > I tried and it works OK, producing the expected results, using the same > xsltProc xslt processor. Hmmmm. I'm using Using libxml 20507, libxslt 10030 and libexslt 720 xsltproc was compiled against libxml 20507, libxslt 10030 and libexslt 720 libxslt 10030 was compiled against libxml 20507 libexslt 720 was compiled against libxml 20507 which is a bit newer than the version you are using. I get the following (obviously incorrect) output. Does anyone know why this newer version of libxslt and libexslt do not act as expected? Thanks, Saverio -- <table> <tr> <td>Vermont</td> <td>Virgin_Islands</td> <td>Virginia</td> <td>Washington</td> </tr> <tr> <td>South_Dakota</td> <td>Tennessee</td> <td>Texas</td> <td>Utah</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Nebraska</td> <td>Nevada</td> <td>Pennsylvania</td> <td>Puerto_Rico</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Kansas</td> <td>Kentucky</td> <td>Maine</td> <td>Maryland</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Washington</td> <td>West_Virginia</td> <td>Wisconsin</td> <td>Wyoming</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Maine</td> <td>Massachusetts</td> <td>Michigan</td> <td>Maryland</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Minnesota</td> <td>Missouri</td> <td>Massachusetts</td> <td>Michigan</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Georgia</td> <td>Hawaii</td> <td>Idaho</td> <td>Guam</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Iowa</td> <td>Kansas</td> <td>Illinois</td> <td>Indiana</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Vermont</td> <td>Virgin_Islands</td> <td>Virginia</td> <td>Utah</td> </tr> </table> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re: Re: html table of sorted , Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | [xsl] Re: Problem using document fu, Dimitre Novatchev |
Re: [xsl] Select statement within H, David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] Select statement within H, SHEIKH Sajjad |
Month |