|
Subject: Re: [xsl] XPath problem: Checking if imidiately preceding sibling is of a certain kind From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 10:11:38 GMT |
test="not('The preceding sibling is an A node')"/>
test="not(preceing-sibling::*[1][self::A])"
You may want to look at
http://www.biglist.com/lists/xsl-list/archives/200402/msg01074.html
including a fix in a followup msg)
and the same answer to a different question earlier in the month
http://www.biglist.com/lists/xsl-list/archives/200402/msg00340.html
--
http://www.dcarlisle.demon.co.uk/matthew
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| [xsl] XPath problem: Checking if im, Ragulf Pickaxe | Thread | Re: [xsl] XPath problem: Checking i, Kevin Jones |
| RE: [xsl] XPath problem: Checking i, Ragulf Pickaxe | Date | Re: [xsl] XPath problem: Checking i, Ragulf Pickaxe |
| Month |