Re: [xsl] table-row height attribute

["Mark Williams" <mark@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Ken,

Thanks for clearing that up.

Regards,

Mark

----- Original Message -----
From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 10:42 PM
Subject: Re: [xsl] table-row height attribute


> Okay, so I was wrong.  :{)}
>
> At 2004-03-09 16:35 -0500, I wrote:
> >But then, I'm not and wasn't on the committee itself, so this is
> >conjecture based on my read of the specification.  Can someone from the
> >committee comment on this interpretation, please?  I hate to mislead
> >anyone, but the explanation above fits the evidence.
>
> Wellllll ... I've been directed to:
>
>    http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/tables.htm
>
> where in section 17.5.3 it explicitly states that height= is a *minimum*
> value for the table row.  So, "fixed" means the minimum is fixed, not that
> the row's height is fixed.  Hmmmmmmmmm.
>
> I sit corrected.
>
> So, I guess my work-around of block-container really is an appropriate
way.
>
> I hope this helps.
>
> ...................... Ken
>
> --
> US XSL training: Washington,DC March 15; San Francisco,CA March 22
> World-wide on-site corporate, government & user group XML training
> G. Ken Holman                 mailto:gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Crane Softwrights Ltd.          http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/
> Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0    +1(613)489-0999 (F:-0995)
> Male Breast Cancer Awareness  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/bc
>
>
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>
>


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list