Subject: Re: [xsl] Coding Optimization for big files From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 16:30:04 GMT |
> right? yes of course, Xpaths always work relative to the current node. > Let's focus only on the problem of defining a variable containing > maybe 100MByte of data inside. As I said in my first reply it's not at all clear that you need to define those variables. Either you just want the current node, or you have a key set up which will get you quickly to where you need to go You haven't shown any use case that would require a variable. Of course loading the original data is going to take time/space (and building the key is going to take some more) but do you really need to save any variables containg large numbers of nodes? David -- http://www.dcarlisle.demon.co.uk/matthew ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Coding Optimization for b, Diego, Vitiello | Thread | [xsl] DOM node, james walker |
RE: [xsl] xsl search engine, Ricaud Matthieu | Date | Re: [xsl] xsl search engine, Robert Koberg |
Month |