|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Another tokenize() question From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 10:59:26 +0100 |
> Should that be {\w+[^{}]*} or something?
aside from the fact that to get a literal { in an attribute value
template you have to use {{ You probably want to allow any number of {}
groups inside your word so that would be
(\w|{[^{}]*})+
ie a sequence of one-or-more (word character or brace-group)
written as
regex="(\w|{{[^{{}}]*}})+"
David
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Another tokenize() questi, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Another tokenize() questi, James Cummings |
| Re: [xsl] Another tokenize() questi, David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] Another tokenize() questi, Michael Kay |
| Month |