Subject: AW: [xsl] Naming styles From: <christof.hoeke@xxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 18:00:55 +0200 |
> As has been noted on this list before, I tend to call all variables x > unless forced by circumstances to use some more radical names > (such as y > or z). Some computer scientists consider this bad style, but > mathematicians have been doing it quite happily for a few > hundred years > without too many problems... > mathematics might be quite abstract. using names which make (any) code more readable (like meaningful xml element names too) are IMHO a better option. XSLT tends to be quite unreadable at times especially with complex xpath expressions and so meaningful variable names is what I would prefer. only exceptions would be like counter variables (which are not very common in xslt of course). chris
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Missing Columns with WriteXml, Tham Tinh | Thread | [xsl] Re: up-converting, Jim_Albright |
Re: [xsl] Naming styles, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] Naming styles, xptm |
Month |