|
Subject: Re: [xsl] collapsing number ranges From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 10:06:39 +0100 |
> Well, you (and future maintainers of your code) might find the > substring() version less obscure. It's odd that: it wouldn't have occurred to me to use a string function to get the last digit, certainly if you were using a language other than xslt1 (which has a habit of coercing silently between numbers and strings) I would have thought that using arithemetic operators would have been far more natural than using string operations. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] collapsing number ranges, Bruce D'Arcus | Thread | Re: [xsl] collapsing number ranges, Jeni Tennison |
| [xsl] Replacing values, David Sinclair | Date | Re: [xsl] collapsing number ranges, David Carlisle |
| Month |